Notes of the West Coast Atlas Meeting held Wednesday, September 7, 2005

Meeting Agenda

Talks were given by Michel, Kai, Warren, Isabel, Margret and Marco. Please refer to their slides for the content of their talks.

Warren's investigation of the Emec energy scale factors are still not fully understood. Rob suggested to cross-check whether the FEB cabling of the channels had been properly taken into account.
Rob also suggested that Warren pick a couple of cells in the middle layer and look at those cells for two different beam impact positions. With that it should be easier to draw a comparison between what Warren is fitting and what Pavol gives in the database.

Marco compared reconstructed energies obtained with OFC's versus Cubic Fit. He obtained some very different results for the HEC leptonic reconstruction in athena 10.4.1 versus athena 8.x. Some guessing went on as to what could cause such an effect. Rob suggested to successively turn on/off in the jobOptions the scale-factors that are to be applied. Mike suggested that it looks very much like there is some default pion rejection going on in 10.4.1


PS: As a result of the above suggestions, both Marco and Warren looked at their data and informed us of updates via email soon after the meeting. The emails are included below:
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:58:38 -0700
From: marco bieri
Hello,

After my talk this morning I looked at Run 734 (120 GeV Positron Hitting the HEC only) again but this time not applying the beam quality tool. The result is here. As you can see we again have the second peak at a lower energy as I had last year ( lower right hand side of page 16 on todays talk ). Therefore we are not dealing with pions that disappeared as we were puzzled by, but in fact positrons that lost energy due to synchrotron radiation while being bent by the bend 9 magnet. The effect is large for that beam impact point since that was the bend 9 bending maximum.

Having straightened that out we are still left with the lower response which I will look at next :-) ....
bye,
Marco


Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Warren Shaw
Hello,

After the discussion during the meeting this morning, I went back and double checked which sampling each channel belongs to. Sure enough, I had swapped which Rinj factor should be applied to which sampling. I've corrected my code and updated and cleaned up my plots, and the agreement between my ramps and the DB values has improved. I've reloaded the corrected slides onto the agenda for today's meeting...feel free to look at the updated slides.
Cheers,
Warren